About Me

Name: Carl Stevens
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Beware the Obamanation Administration

        “If you’ve got a gun in your house, I’m not taking it.” “Even if I want to take them away, I don’t have the votes in Congress,’’ - Barack Obama in Duryea, Pa., Sept. 2008
Everyone remembers these famous words spoken during the 2008 Presidential election campaign.
Since then, after the election, we’ve been told by his hand picked Attorney General, Eric Holder, that:
·        Re-implementing the so-called “Assault Weapons Ban” will reduce crime along the U.S/Mexico border.
·        That 90% of weapons found at crime scenes and in police raids in Mexico originated in the U.S.
Both of these claims have been de-bunked by federal government agencies.
·        The Dept. of Justice found that the failed “Assault Weapons Ban” did nothing to lower crime rates in its 10 year run. Nor did we experience the "blood running in the streets" that was predicted when it expired.
·        The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives stated the day the “90%” claim was made that the number of weapons found in Mexico that came from the U.S. was greatly exaggerated. Not to mention that weapons confiscated in Mexico also include grenades, rocket launchers, and other explosive ordinance, every single one of which is already illegal to sell to the general public in the U.S., let alone Mexico.
       
This is a disturbing start for an administration that campaigned on the slogan “I’m not going to take away your guns.” - Barack Obama in Duryea, Pa., Sept. 2008

        Even more distressing is a piece of proposed legislation introduced into the House of Representatives on April 29, 2009.
This proposed legislation is H.R. 2159 - Denying Firearms and Explosives to Dangerous Terrorists Act of 2009. The purpose of this legislation is stated:

“To increase public safety by permitting the Attorney General to deny the transfer of a firearm or the issuance of firearms or explosives licenses to a known or suspected dangerous terrorist.”

        Did you catch that?
        Denying firearms etc. to “suspected” terrorists.
This may have gone unnoticed if the Dept. of Homeland Security Secretary, another one of Obama’s hand picks-Janet Napolitano, hadn’t recently released a particular memo to law enforcement personnel that listed people to watch out for. This memo stated that if you are concerned about illegal immigration, increasing federal power, restrictions on firearms, the loss of U.S. sovereignty, and abortion that you were a potential “Right Wing Extremist” and could be “suspected” of being a terrorist. This sounds like a watch list for the average, everyday, American taxpayer. Since when is holding a conservative political belief a crime?
        If this proposed legislation is enacted into law, Attorney General Holder-who is already actively working to curb our Constitutional,
2nd Amendment rights, only has to “suspect” that you are a threat to national security and can deny you access to firearm purchases and, potentially, arms that you already own; i.e. confiscation. What about due process of the law? What happened to “innocent until proven guilty”?
        In this proposed legislation is a provision to appeal the denial, to see the evidence against you. But…all Attorney General Holder has to state is that revealing said evidence could be detrimental to national security - access denied. Supposedly there is a provision for that too but my guess is that you'd have a better chance pounding sand.
        Some of you may think that this is a petty argument, in which the Attorney General wouldn’t stoop to such underhanded tactics, but I ask you to consider this:
        When Eric Holder was Deputy Attorney General in the Clinton administration, the national instant check system (NICS), that is necessary for firearm purchases through a Federal Firearm Licensed (FFL) dealer, was under Holders direct control. From when it "went live" in 1998 until January 2001, the NICS system was routinely off line or in a state of malfunction, effectively precluding FFL dealers from completing firearm sales transactions. With the change of administration in 2001, the NICS program was suddenly as reliable as a ticking clock. Now this may fall under the category of hearsay, but I have noticed a couple FFL dealers experiencing “software issues” with NICS since January of this year. Is all this a coincidence? Maybe…maybe not, but it sure has suspicious timing.
        All of this seems to point to an administration that said anything to ensure that it was elected into office. But, once in office, they “forgot” everything they campaigned on and go on to push their own agenda, either openly- Holders intentions of reinstating the Assault Weapons Ban in January, or clandestinely- H.R. 2159 linked with Napolitano’s “Right Wing Extremist” memo.
        Be afraid America, be very afraid.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obvious

   The current fight in the Democratic party about seating delegates from Michigan and Florida is exactly what is wrong with society today.
 
     FL and MI knew what would happen weeks before they moved the dates of their primaries. Both the National Republicans and Democrats said that there would be a punishment if they did. The states moved their primaries and the hammer came down. The Republicans took their punishment, made a deal to seat some delegates and went on their way. The Democrats are now crying and fighting to get their delegates seated. They can't believe that there is actually a punishment that they will have to endure.
   And that is exactly what I'm talking about as far as todays society. They can't fathom being held responsible for their actions. They seem to think that there is always an "alternative" that they can twist to their own advantage. Sound familiar? Just go to any High School, USA and you'll see what I'm talking about. These schools, taught largely by Liberal Democrat "educators" are teaching students that there is no accountability for their actions. They are oppressed, or misunderstood, or neglected, or insert any excuse you can think of. These students are then turned out into a world where they are totally unprepared for real life. Or, they head off to college for further indoctrination.
   In both cases the students enter the actual world and are totally slapped in the face with reality. "What do you mean I have to come in to work? My girl just broke up with me!"
   The Democrats need to suck it up and take their medicine.
Before you take me to task, I am from Michigan.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Anti gun clap trap

I recently sent a copy of this letter to the Associated Press:
Dear Editor,

I’d like to open this letter with a quote from: The Associated Press, STATEMENT OF NEWS VALUES AND PRINCIPLES.

“In the 21st century, that news is transmitted in more ways than ever before – in print, on the air and on the Web, with words, images, graphics, sounds and video. But always and in all media, we insist on the highest standards of integrity and ethical behavior when we gather and deliver the news.

That means we abhor inaccuracies, carelessness, bias or distortions. It means we will not knowingly introduce false information into material intended for publication or broadcast; nor will we alter photo or image content. Quotations must be accurate, and precise.”

In light of this pledge of integrity, particularly bias and inaccuracies, how could you in all good conscience, release the story vilifying the AK-47 type rifle by AP writer Matt Sedensky?

His story is rife with bias, inaccuracy, and deception. Examples are as follows:

1. “Figures from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, obtained by The Associated Press through public records requests, show a marked increase in the number of AK-type weapons traced and entered into the agency's computer database because they had been seized or connected to a crime.”

Sedensky leads the reader to believe that only “crime guns” are checked through BATF computer tracing when in fact, this is not true. Many firearms are checked through the BATF that have no connection with any crime. Any FFL dealer who buys or sells a firearm to a legal, law abiding citizen has to run the serial number through the BATF trace computers.

2. “Bullets fired by AK-47s travel at a higher velocity than those from many other weapons, and can do grievous damage to the body. Often they have enough energy to pass clear through.”

Again, the writer misleads the reader into believing that the 7.62X39mm round fired in the AK type rifle is especially lethal. The truth is; that particular round is considered capable of taking medium sized game such as deer and coyote. There is much higher velocity and higher energy ammunition that has been available to hunters and shooters for over a hundred years.

3. “A 2004 study by the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence concluded the U.S. ban on AKs and other guns was successful, saying in the five years before its passage, assault weapons made up 4.82 percent of ATF crime gun traces, compared with 1.61 percent between 1995 and 2003.”

 

Of course the number of traces went down, it was illegal to sell this firearm. Also, his source material is about as biased as you can get concerning gun control. A more neutral source would have been the Dept. of Justice. But, I don’t think their information fit the writers intentions as the DOJ has found that the Clinton gun ban had NO effect on crimes utilizing these particular firearms.

4. “Most of the AKs on American streets are semiautomatic, meaning they fire as fast as the gunman can squeeze the trigger. Fully automatic ones, common on the battlefield, require just one pull of the trigger to release a burst of fire.”

Sedensky’s anti-gun bias veritably drips from this statement. Not only is it inaccurate in the description of how a semiautomatic firearm works, it is an extremely inflammatory remark. The proper description of the operation consists of a single pull of the trigger results in a single round being fired. The action cycles to load another round but the trigger must be pulled again to fire. I also take great offense to the description of the person doing the shooting as being a “gunman”. This conjures up visions of criminals doing bad things, which I’m sure was the effect Sedensky was trying to achieve.

 

He includes one small, token paragraph of an opposing view from a representative of the NRA but immediately jumps back into the emotional, “blood in the streets” invective so often abused by the gun control crowd.

I would hope that the Associated Press would like to be held in the highest esteem of editorial behavior. But, to continue to release such biased, inaccurate “stories” such as this and a similar, related story by Keith Ridler, will lower the level of journalistic integrity at AP to the level of supermarket tabloid.

Please, feel free to contact me if you would like to discuss this matter and I would like to inform you that I will be sending a copy of this letter to any and all news outlets I find carrying this story.

Thank you.

Carl Stevens

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (6) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »